Tuesday, April 12, 2005

for me?

tonigh treepal said that he doesn't like reading my sites because "i kno it's gonna take forever." ...do you kno that i used to read his site even when that intro was up and i was on dailup? do you kno that i'd wait like fives mintues a time for the freaking thing to load? and to skip it would not have made much difference anyway? cause it'd take the same amount of time anyway? yes. i would wait. and damnit i would have read his webiste even if it had taken longer. why? cause i'm his f*cking girlfriend that's why. cause as the significant other you're supposed to care. and support and damnit, you're supposed to read their effing sites. esp if they update every damn day they're at school. and since you kno they update every night, why wait to add to the already unbearable load? why not just check every night and that way not only will you have done your duty, but the next time you check it won't "take forever." christ. was thinking about that one thanksgiving felicity episode when ben brings lauren to dinner after felicity and him have broken up because she cheated on him. people start flaring up at ben, and felicity defends him saying that he didn't do anything wrong. to which he replies that she's right, except to waste a year and a half on her. except that he really didn't. in every relationship you learn things, if you're smart anyway. and he learned that having a cheating girlfriend is bad. and yeah. that seems a little more than just obvious. but it happens, and all the time. people cheat. and you expect to not be cheated on. you expect that your boif will support your endevors, and yet... when telling others wat you want in a partner, it isn't enough to just say good dancer and lies rock music. you also have to say reliable, supportive, honest, stable, commited, sane, etc. cause from each relationship you learn that it's the obvious things that aren't so obvious.

'this shit right here is for you' / 'i could have never lived if it wasn't for you' / 'you would never known what you may put me through' / 'i'd do it for you'

No comments: