i love lemonade. seriously. i love it. and when i go to restaurants that serve "fancy" lemonades, i will usually order one. so rip and ting suggested that i make a site and rate lemonades. i'm sure they were joking. but imma do it anyway. :) btw, i don't know anything about wine or beer so i can't talk about its "body" or how it has a "malty finish.". it'll really just be simple stuff, and if i like it or not. ha!
fentimans victorian lemonade - uk
lightly carbonated, glass bottle, 9.3 oz / 275 ml, $5 at wurstkuche
"naturally fermented," <1/2% alcohol," lemon juice blended with "ginger root, speedwell and juniper extracts"
- i have no idea what speedwell is, but it did definitely have a hint of ginger, which i liked. didn't catch the juniper though. natural tasting, not sweet, pretty sour. would have again (but only if cheaper!!)
almdudler limonade - austria
carbonated, aluminum can, 11.7 fl.oz./ 330 ml, <$2 at euro market
herbal lemonade
- unusual lemonade. more like ginger ale mixed with 7up. reminds me of chinese aiyu jelly. not a strong taste, not sweet, a little sour. would have again. (though reep would not, lol)
hansen's natural cane soda in pomegranate - us
carbonated, aluminum can, 12 oz / 355 ml, <$1 at whole foods
not lemonade
- not very pomegranate-y. not much taste at all actually. a bit like italian soda, so it starts off like seltzer water, but has a fruity taste afterward. weird. wouldn't buy, but would drink again.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Monday, March 28, 2011
fair wages
when people talk about illegal immigration they're usually (especially here in so cal) talking about the ones (usually from mexico) who come and do agricultural work (or other labor work) for under minimum wage.
i know a major argument of those "supporting" illegal immigration is that a lot of those aliens are doing jobs most americans don't want to do anyway. but besides that farming is really hard work, maybe it's because many of those farms aren't willing to pay fair wages. so what legal citizen is going to work there? i don't think even a small percentage of americans would. probably only a teeny tiny number. why work in a field doing back breaking labor if you can work in a store and get paid more money?
but most illegals can't find work that pays legal amounts, so they have to work for employers who are willing to take the risk of hiring them. and if a company is willing to do that, why would they pay fair wages? there's certainly no reason to (other than those pesky moral ones). there's nothing on paper, nothing to report, and more profits this way.
you wouldn't let a company get away with paying legal citizens anything less than minimum wage, so why it is okay that they pay illegal workers so little? just because they don't pay taxes? well, how much do you pay in taxes per paycheck? no more than 25% most likely, so shouldn't illegals get paid at least 75% of minimum wage? (of course, part of your taxes goes to social security, which illegals cannot take advantage of) whether you are for tighter or looser immigration laws, i don't think you can argue that people deserve far more or far less compensation for the same amount of work simply because of how they entered a country.
instead of getting mad at illegals, or border patrol, or bleeding heart liberals, maybe we should get mad at those who are exploiting the poor.
i know a major argument of those "supporting" illegal immigration is that a lot of those aliens are doing jobs most americans don't want to do anyway. but besides that farming is really hard work, maybe it's because many of those farms aren't willing to pay fair wages. so what legal citizen is going to work there? i don't think even a small percentage of americans would. probably only a teeny tiny number. why work in a field doing back breaking labor if you can work in a store and get paid more money?
but most illegals can't find work that pays legal amounts, so they have to work for employers who are willing to take the risk of hiring them. and if a company is willing to do that, why would they pay fair wages? there's certainly no reason to (other than those pesky moral ones). there's nothing on paper, nothing to report, and more profits this way.
you wouldn't let a company get away with paying legal citizens anything less than minimum wage, so why it is okay that they pay illegal workers so little? just because they don't pay taxes? well, how much do you pay in taxes per paycheck? no more than 25% most likely, so shouldn't illegals get paid at least 75% of minimum wage? (of course, part of your taxes goes to social security, which illegals cannot take advantage of) whether you are for tighter or looser immigration laws, i don't think you can argue that people deserve far more or far less compensation for the same amount of work simply because of how they entered a country.
instead of getting mad at illegals, or border patrol, or bleeding heart liberals, maybe we should get mad at those who are exploiting the poor.
Friday, March 25, 2011
.xxx
"The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers authorized the creation of an .xxx suffix for pornography Web sites." [source]
i think this is a great idea! altho i think an even better idea would be to make all porn sites register for .xxx, tax them, and fine porn sites who use anything other than .xxx.
1. if all porn sites are under .xxx it would be a lot easier for schools, libraries, and offices to ban access to .xxx'es from their computers.
2. rip asked why i would want to levy a tax on all .xxx'es. ...well, why not? we tax nearly everything else don't we? also, this way i think there would be fewer free porn sites, which means that kids (well, those without access to credit or debit cards anyway) won't be able to see it. which is good, because that's illegal anyway.
3. the fine for porn sites using regular .com or .net is pretty self explanatory. more money for the govt. which means less taxes for the rest of us.
i think this is a great idea! altho i think an even better idea would be to make all porn sites register for .xxx, tax them, and fine porn sites who use anything other than .xxx.
1. if all porn sites are under .xxx it would be a lot easier for schools, libraries, and offices to ban access to .xxx'es from their computers.
2. rip asked why i would want to levy a tax on all .xxx'es. ...well, why not? we tax nearly everything else don't we? also, this way i think there would be fewer free porn sites, which means that kids (well, those without access to credit or debit cards anyway) won't be able to see it. which is good, because that's illegal anyway.
3. the fine for porn sites using regular .com or .net is pretty self explanatory. more money for the govt. which means less taxes for the rest of us.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
happiness
in federico fellini's 8 1/2: "happiness is being able to tell the truth without ever making anyone suffer."
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
cow chip bingo!
this past weekend my high school band, kennedy shamrock regiment, had the most amazing fundraiser: cow chip bingo!! they tried to sell three thousand $5 land parcels, and released three cows. if a cow pooped on your land (first three plops anyway), you got money! hilarious!!
we bought six tickets total (2 split between the 6, one for chang, one for her office mate, one for me, one for rip), but we didn't win. :( chang flew down, g drove up, and ting and i went and stayed for less than an hour (cause really, watching cows shit isn't all that much fun), but we had fun naming the cows: frisky (she kept kicking!), brownie (cause she's brown, duh), and little one (she was littlier, again, duh!).
and the weekend before that ting, rip and i went to "old world" in huntington beach (like alpine village) to watch wiener dog races! it was only a dollar and about an hour long (perfect length really). it was silly, fun, and kind of... i dunno. kitschy and cute, i guess. :)
we bought six tickets total (2 split between the 6, one for chang, one for her office mate, one for me, one for rip), but we didn't win. :( chang flew down, g drove up, and ting and i went and stayed for less than an hour (cause really, watching cows shit isn't all that much fun), but we had fun naming the cows: frisky (she kept kicking!), brownie (cause she's brown, duh), and little one (she was littlier, again, duh!).
and the weekend before that ting, rip and i went to "old world" in huntington beach (like alpine village) to watch wiener dog races! it was only a dollar and about an hour long (perfect length really). it was silly, fun, and kind of... i dunno. kitschy and cute, i guess. :)
Sunday, March 20, 2011
cake stands
with food, taste isn't everything. you most likely see it before you eat it so good presentation helps! (i keep thinking about cake stands because we went to abbot kinney a few weekends ago and saw a shop that was filled with beautiful things, including cake stands. wish i had taken pictures!)
here are some beautiful cake stands from burlap + blue. they sell other things too, like coasters and wreaths, but i love cake so... :)
here are some beautiful cake stands from burlap + blue. they sell other things too, like coasters and wreaths, but i love cake so... :)
store: burlap + blue prices: $15 - $40 (cake stands) |
Thursday, March 17, 2011
hands off
i don't like to hug. i don't even really like to shake hands. it's not that i worry about sweaty hands, b.o., or germs, i just like my personal space. juliet lapidos wrote an article for slate about the newish trend of hugging everybody and anybody hello and goodbye, and how she doesn't like it either.
lapidos writes: "Granted, with the right person, I enjoy a well-placed hug. The right persons include: blood relations, my boyfriend, and close friends. By "well-placed" I mean before or after a lengthy separation, as a form of congratulation (you're getting married!), as a means of consolation (you're getting divorced?), or to ward off hypothermia. That's about it (though I should specify that I waive the category requirements for my boyfriend)."
maybe it's because i'm from a typically non-affectionate asian family, but i'm even less into hugging that lapidos is. i only really like hugs from my boyfriend. and from others, i only want hugs to fend off the cold. my best friends know this, so they'll hug each other when we meet up and say goodbye, but i get just a "hello!" or "see you later!" and actually, for many years a constant complaint from my boyfriend was that i wasn't physically affectionate enough. even today, i don't think we're very into pda. we sit across each other at restaurants, i'll always choose an empty seat over his lap; unless it's cold, we don't generally walk with our arms around each other (though we do hold hands); and we don't ever make out in public (i'm actually pretty sure that we've got out for hours at a time and said goodbye and not kissed at all, just forgetting to).
honestly, if it were entirely up to me, we'd probably have even less physical contact. when i drive, he likes to put his hand on my leg. but i drive stick and it's small car so he gets in my way. and when we spoon, i prefer to be in back, so that once he falls asleep i can move away and scratch myself, fidget, and whatever without disturbing him. but i swear, i love him!
i had a boss once who was normal at maintaining bodily personal space, but bad at keeping his fingers to himself. haha, that sounds weird and creepy. but no. if i were handing him the stapler, i would keep my fingers on the end of it, so my hand doesn't cover more than even half of it. but when taking the stapler, he would grab onto the whole thing, so his fingers would touch mine. the first few times this happened i wondered if there was something he was trying to tell me. but no. he just didn't notice where his fingers went.
...i sound like a crazy person. but really, i'm not. i don't need everyone to stay 3 feet away from me. i sit next to people, even strangers. i don't care. ...tho i hate it when i'm waiting in line and the person behind me keeps bumping into me. anyway. until reading this article i didn't realize how many people are like me. ::fingers crossed::, maybe most people are "non-hugger[s] who hug" and we're just so afraid of offending people or appearing standoffish that we let these huggy people invade our space.
i, for one, try to get out of hugging people as hard as i can. i stay on the edges, hold onto stuff, fake being occupied, and leave early. it works pretty well. :)
lapidos writes: "Granted, with the right person, I enjoy a well-placed hug. The right persons include: blood relations, my boyfriend, and close friends. By "well-placed" I mean before or after a lengthy separation, as a form of congratulation (you're getting married!), as a means of consolation (you're getting divorced?), or to ward off hypothermia. That's about it (though I should specify that I waive the category requirements for my boyfriend)."
maybe it's because i'm from a typically non-affectionate asian family, but i'm even less into hugging that lapidos is. i only really like hugs from my boyfriend. and from others, i only want hugs to fend off the cold. my best friends know this, so they'll hug each other when we meet up and say goodbye, but i get just a "hello!" or "see you later!" and actually, for many years a constant complaint from my boyfriend was that i wasn't physically affectionate enough. even today, i don't think we're very into pda. we sit across each other at restaurants, i'll always choose an empty seat over his lap; unless it's cold, we don't generally walk with our arms around each other (though we do hold hands); and we don't ever make out in public (i'm actually pretty sure that we've got out for hours at a time and said goodbye and not kissed at all, just forgetting to).
honestly, if it were entirely up to me, we'd probably have even less physical contact. when i drive, he likes to put his hand on my leg. but i drive stick and it's small car so he gets in my way. and when we spoon, i prefer to be in back, so that once he falls asleep i can move away and scratch myself, fidget, and whatever without disturbing him. but i swear, i love him!
i had a boss once who was normal at maintaining bodily personal space, but bad at keeping his fingers to himself. haha, that sounds weird and creepy. but no. if i were handing him the stapler, i would keep my fingers on the end of it, so my hand doesn't cover more than even half of it. but when taking the stapler, he would grab onto the whole thing, so his fingers would touch mine. the first few times this happened i wondered if there was something he was trying to tell me. but no. he just didn't notice where his fingers went.
...i sound like a crazy person. but really, i'm not. i don't need everyone to stay 3 feet away from me. i sit next to people, even strangers. i don't care. ...tho i hate it when i'm waiting in line and the person behind me keeps bumping into me. anyway. until reading this article i didn't realize how many people are like me. ::fingers crossed::, maybe most people are "non-hugger[s] who hug" and we're just so afraid of offending people or appearing standoffish that we let these huggy people invade our space.
i, for one, try to get out of hugging people as hard as i can. i stay on the edges, hold onto stuff, fake being occupied, and leave early. it works pretty well. :)
Monday, March 14, 2011
glasses drive tally
my lion's club eyeglasses drive has been going on for what seems like years now. (which is exactly why, when you organize a drive, you need to set clear end dates!!) and tho i'm still waiting on a few pairs, yesterday i handed over the ones i've collected. here's my re-cap and tally.
44 pairs total. 23 sunglasses, 20 clear prescription glasses, and one weird pair (that i got when i went for lasik).
when i dropped off the glasses to my lion's club contact, he told me that they had distributed 300,000 pairs in mexico two years ago. seriously. three hundred thousand. that's freaking amazing! i'm not sure if they do just one country every year or if they give to several, but i think it's several because he also said that last year they gave 60,000 pairs to haiti. also awesome!
so a HUGE thanks to everyone to helped with the drive. :)
44 pairs total. 23 sunglasses, 20 clear prescription glasses, and one weird pair (that i got when i went for lasik).
when i dropped off the glasses to my lion's club contact, he told me that they had distributed 300,000 pairs in mexico two years ago. seriously. three hundred thousand. that's freaking amazing! i'm not sure if they do just one country every year or if they give to several, but i think it's several because he also said that last year they gave 60,000 pairs to haiti. also awesome!
so a HUGE thanks to everyone to helped with the drive. :)
Friday, March 11, 2011
protecting free speech
if you've been following the news at all, you must've heard about the supreme court's decision about westboro baptist church (google news links, summary article). and as terrible, shameful, despicable, hateful, disrespectful as i find these westboro baptist protesters to be, i think the supreme court made the right decision (though justice alito dissented).
also in the news last week was dior designer john galliano's anti-semitic rants in paris (google news links). galliano was fired from dior and is now facing possible jail time for his racist remarks.
not to trivialize galliano's disgusting behavior, but many people think it's a bit unfair that a drunk guy saying racist things should get jail time, when gay-bashers with hateful signs can show up to a funeral of a soldier (who may or may not be gay!!) and have our highest judicial power defend their right to do so.
but galliano was in france. and we're in the states. and i don't think ANY other country takes "freedom of speech" as seriously as we do. it's illegal in france to say anti-semitic things. and i heard in germany it's illegal to name your kids after hitler (unable to verify this tho). and it's illegal in lots of other countries, to say anything against the government (even if it's actually true!).
but every citizen of america has the right to free speech in america. the westboro protesters can say hateful things, and i have the right to protest at one of their funerals and say equally hateful things, if not worse! of course, i'm not a fucking douche bag so i wouldn't do that.
the thing i have a problem with, is that as much freedom of speech as we have, there are limitations. i can't say "fuck" on regular tv. that's kind of weird, actually. i'm also not allowed to say defamatory things about people (tho i think the westboro baptist protesters are defaming god when they say stuff like "god blew up the shuttle" and "god hates fags" but i think in order for it to count, he'd have to press charges...)
why couldn't the supreme court have set up limitations for the protesters? you can protest, but only from 500 yards away, or anywhere that's not on the funeral route.
it's so disrespectful! this war we're fighting, it's not over gay rights! (it's debatable what we're actually for but for damn sure it's not gay rights). this soldier didn't die for gay rights. in fact, many of these soldiers may actually be against gay rights (most americans are anyway, and soldiers tend to be more conservative, upping their chance of being anti gay rights). if god really hated america because we like gays, why didn't he cause 9-11 to happen in san fransisco or hollywood? i mean, new york? they're liberal, but i wouldn't have picked them as the poster city for gay rights. america even!! why not the netherlands: "the first country in the world to grant full marriage and registered partnership rights for same-sex couples" [source], or even spain, cananda or south africa! yes, certain u.s. states have given rights to same-sex couples, but many haven't. and our federal government doesn't have laws protecting one thing or another.
gah. anyway. i agree with chief justice roberts who said that the 1st amendment protects "even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate." tho i really wish that the westboro baptist protesters could see that whatever your opinion on gay rights or free speech, you should be respectful of the dead. especially those who died to protect you and this country with its very liberal freedom of speech laws.
and to finish this up on a funny note: the 30 best anti-westboro baptist church protest signs
also in the news last week was dior designer john galliano's anti-semitic rants in paris (google news links). galliano was fired from dior and is now facing possible jail time for his racist remarks.
not to trivialize galliano's disgusting behavior, but many people think it's a bit unfair that a drunk guy saying racist things should get jail time, when gay-bashers with hateful signs can show up to a funeral of a soldier (who may or may not be gay!!) and have our highest judicial power defend their right to do so.
but galliano was in france. and we're in the states. and i don't think ANY other country takes "freedom of speech" as seriously as we do. it's illegal in france to say anti-semitic things. and i heard in germany it's illegal to name your kids after hitler (unable to verify this tho). and it's illegal in lots of other countries, to say anything against the government (even if it's actually true!).
but every citizen of america has the right to free speech in america. the westboro protesters can say hateful things, and i have the right to protest at one of their funerals and say equally hateful things, if not worse! of course, i'm not a fucking douche bag so i wouldn't do that.
the thing i have a problem with, is that as much freedom of speech as we have, there are limitations. i can't say "fuck" on regular tv. that's kind of weird, actually. i'm also not allowed to say defamatory things about people (tho i think the westboro baptist protesters are defaming god when they say stuff like "god blew up the shuttle" and "god hates fags" but i think in order for it to count, he'd have to press charges...)
why couldn't the supreme court have set up limitations for the protesters? you can protest, but only from 500 yards away, or anywhere that's not on the funeral route.
it's so disrespectful! this war we're fighting, it's not over gay rights! (it's debatable what we're actually for but for damn sure it's not gay rights). this soldier didn't die for gay rights. in fact, many of these soldiers may actually be against gay rights (most americans are anyway, and soldiers tend to be more conservative, upping their chance of being anti gay rights). if god really hated america because we like gays, why didn't he cause 9-11 to happen in san fransisco or hollywood? i mean, new york? they're liberal, but i wouldn't have picked them as the poster city for gay rights. america even!! why not the netherlands: "the first country in the world to grant full marriage and registered partnership rights for same-sex couples" [source], or even spain, cananda or south africa! yes, certain u.s. states have given rights to same-sex couples, but many haven't. and our federal government doesn't have laws protecting one thing or another.
gah. anyway. i agree with chief justice roberts who said that the 1st amendment protects "even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate." tho i really wish that the westboro baptist protesters could see that whatever your opinion on gay rights or free speech, you should be respectful of the dead. especially those who died to protect you and this country with its very liberal freedom of speech laws.
and to finish this up on a funny note: the 30 best anti-westboro baptist church protest signs
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
28th bday
short summary of my 28th bday celebrations
2/22 - rip and i go to wingstop for their 50cent wings. yay!
2/26 - rip buys me a stripey sweater at ann taylor loft for my bday. he's my sugar daddy! we were supposed to be shopping for his korea trip, but... :)
3/3 - go to habana cafe in downey for dinner with my parents. tried to go to the porto's down the street, but they were closed. :(
3/4 - meet ting and g at red robin for dinner, then we pick up chang and angel from lax
3/5 - late start day (went to do steering certifications in the morning). we go to the watt's towers (amazing!), wurstkuche for lunch (very good! tho crowded like mad. i got a hot italian sausage and a fentimans victorian lemonade), watched the derby dolls (exhibition between la and sd), and left at halftime to go to the always fun bootie la. pirates booty came by and we got a picture with the pirate himself as well as several bags of 'chips.'
3/6 - itty bitty art sale in santa monica, father's office for lunch (next time, i don't care how unhungry i am, i'm getting steak and olives!), then abbot kinney for a "flea market" and shopping. we then tried to go to the venice art walls but couldn't find parking (and honestly, no one else seemed interested) so we went to lemonade for some sweets. i should've gotten a drink (i LOVE lemonade, after all. tho, haha, i did get one the day before) but it was pretty cold and i didn't have a jacket. since we had some extra time before dropping off angel and chang at lax, we went to the howard hughes center. their borders is closing (so sad!), but i did get a $1 book.
3/7 - not quite part of my birthday, but rip came back from korea and we spend the rest of the afternoon together before my film class.
the girls, btw, got me the wwd: 100 years commemorative magazine. yay!
2/22 - rip and i go to wingstop for their 50cent wings. yay!
2/26 - rip buys me a stripey sweater at ann taylor loft for my bday. he's my sugar daddy! we were supposed to be shopping for his korea trip, but... :)
3/3 - go to habana cafe in downey for dinner with my parents. tried to go to the porto's down the street, but they were closed. :(
3/4 - meet ting and g at red robin for dinner, then we pick up chang and angel from lax
3/5 - late start day (went to do steering certifications in the morning). we go to the watt's towers (amazing!), wurstkuche for lunch (very good! tho crowded like mad. i got a hot italian sausage and a fentimans victorian lemonade), watched the derby dolls (exhibition between la and sd), and left at halftime to go to the always fun bootie la. pirates booty came by and we got a picture with the pirate himself as well as several bags of 'chips.'
3/6 - itty bitty art sale in santa monica, father's office for lunch (next time, i don't care how unhungry i am, i'm getting steak and olives!), then abbot kinney for a "flea market" and shopping. we then tried to go to the venice art walls but couldn't find parking (and honestly, no one else seemed interested) so we went to lemonade for some sweets. i should've gotten a drink (i LOVE lemonade, after all. tho, haha, i did get one the day before) but it was pretty cold and i didn't have a jacket. since we had some extra time before dropping off angel and chang at lax, we went to the howard hughes center. their borders is closing (so sad!), but i did get a $1 book.
3/7 - not quite part of my birthday, but rip came back from korea and we spend the rest of the afternoon together before my film class.
the girls, btw, got me the wwd: 100 years commemorative magazine. yay!
Thursday, March 3, 2011
charlie sheen
i LOVE this photo!! |
i'm not sure about frey and his sobriety currently, but when reading his "memoir" he really did sound like a changed man. (though it very much worried me when it was exposed that his "memoir" was actually semi-fictional. he was publically berated by oprah on her show. and that just seemed mean to me. like she was unintentionally pushing him back towards drugs. because apptly his literary talent doesn't matter. it only mattered that he had the gall to lie to oprah.) but sheen isn't nearly as convincing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)