Wednesday, October 31, 2012
halloween
it goes without saying that i have a huge problem with unnecessarily slutty halloween costumes. there's a pretty funny tumblr called "fuck no sexist halloween costumes" that has side by side comparisons of some costume ideas.
but i'm actually blogging about the video clip from abc's "what would you do?" if you're too busy/lazy to watch the 7+min clip, you can see the gif summary here.
rip and i talked about something similar, which i blogged about. i'm not going to go into detail about how i feel and why (since my opinions haven't changed), but i wouldn't have too big of a problem if my kids wanted to cross dress for halloween. i myself did it in high school for god's sake.
Sunday, October 28, 2012
i know nothing!
Italy Finds Scientists Guilty Of Manslaughter For 2009 Earthquake Forecast
and
Italian Scientists Sentenced to 6 Years for Earthquake Statements
this is CRAZY. scientists can't predict earthquakes. and the committee did not say that they could either. they also didn't deny that there would be earthquakes. they only said that it was "unlikely." true, they probably shouldn't have gone even that far but to be sued and convicted! this is madness!
related article: Shaky Ground: Can Seismologists Be Charged with a Crime for Not Predicting Deadly Quakes?
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Monday, October 22, 2012
over-nutrition
just finished michael pollan's the omnivore's dilemma. and while there were a LOT of interesting things. this one stuck out to me:
"the disease formerly known as adult-onset diabetes has had to be renamed type II diabetes since it now occurs so frequently in children." (102)
also: "...the united nations reported that in 2000 the number of people suffering from overnutrition--a billion-- had officially surpassed the number suffering from malnutrition--800 million." (102)
related video on the pasture-raised chickens.
"the disease formerly known as adult-onset diabetes has had to be renamed type II diabetes since it now occurs so frequently in children." (102)
also: "...the united nations reported that in 2000 the number of people suffering from overnutrition--a billion-- had officially surpassed the number suffering from malnutrition--800 million." (102)
related video on the pasture-raised chickens.
Friday, October 19, 2012
animal testing
fedex and ups commit to not ship research animals
yes, maybe "most invasive chimpanzee research was scientifically unnecessary" but is most non-invasive animal research unnecessary as well? i'm against testing on animals for things like cosmetics. but what's the alternative for testing on them for serious things like medicines? testing on people. and i'd much rather scientists test on animals than on people! i get that animals can't give consent, and that people can, but i also feel like most human research volunteers aren't doing it just to further scientific or medical progress or whatever. most likely, they need the money. and i don't think exploiting the poor is an acceptable alternative to testing on animals.
yes, maybe "most invasive chimpanzee research was scientifically unnecessary" but is most non-invasive animal research unnecessary as well? i'm against testing on animals for things like cosmetics. but what's the alternative for testing on them for serious things like medicines? testing on people. and i'd much rather scientists test on animals than on people! i get that animals can't give consent, and that people can, but i also feel like most human research volunteers aren't doing it just to further scientific or medical progress or whatever. most likely, they need the money. and i don't think exploiting the poor is an acceptable alternative to testing on animals.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Saturday, October 13, 2012
catalina
much earlier this year rip messed up and i asked him to make it up to me. anything he wanted. whatever he thought was appropriate. he decided on a trip to catalina (cause we had bought groupon boat tickets earlier). of course, there was more drama before we went (like when and why we were going at all). but eventually we went a couple weekends ago with g and her husband. ...i know. i actually hadn't given it much thought, but t brought it up "wasn't supposed to be just you and him?" and yeah, it was. but i guess i figured that if we didn't go with g and bill, and soon, we probably just wouldn't and g/bill prob wouldn't either and we'd all end up wasting out tickets. anyway. it was fine. i mean, i don't know that i would really count this as "making it up to me" since it was mostly g and i that made it happen, but oh well, he's been pretty great lately.
after we got to the island we had lunch and walked around a bit. then we went kayaking starting from descanso beach. no pictures tho, since we didn't have a waterproof camera. :( which is a real shame cause the water is crazy clear! the scenery wasn't very varied, but it was nice to get out onto the water and be able to see the island from another perspective.
later g and i went snorkeling in lover's cove while rip and bill stayed on shore. she had done it before and i was very excited to try it (it's on my bucket list, after all). i actually had a terrible time of it. rip had warned me about it before but i figured that since i'm a mouth breather anyway it would do okay. what i didn't realize was that it wasn't so much the physical part that was hard, it was the mental aspect. altho i knew it was totally safe, i just could not get over the fact that i was breathing underwater! it didn't help that for the first 10minutes or so i wore the mask wrong. i hadn't really looked that mask so i wore it like a ski mask, above the nose. rip eventually pointed it to me that i was supposed to wear it over the nose. even later after that, annie showed me how to get a good fit on the goggles. they still leaked a little, but it was much better.
now that i was wearing my equipment properly i had a physically easier time of it. but mentally i still couldn't quite get the hang of it. eventually i ended up swimming with my fingers on the lenses of my goggles, which helped. i think maybe so i wouldn't "forget" i was wearing a snorkel. i also tried to stay near people cause that made me feel more comfortable. even so, i would was still hyperventilating and screaming every time a wave came over me or when fish got too close (some big ones had pretty scary sharp teeth!). lol. even tho i didn't have a particularly good time, i would definitely do it again. the scariness is all mental, so it was worth it to see the fish in their "natural environment".
the next day we went on a bus tour that took us up thru the mountains and to the airport. we saw a few buffalo and watched an airplane take off. i like that catalina (well, avalon anyway, which is the main [only?] city on the island) is so small. i did everything i wanted to do, and didn't feel rushed at all.
after we got back we went to flemings for their happy hour and rip finally had their amazing burger. a great closer to a very relaxing two days.
descanso beach |
very few cars, mostly golf carts |
now that i was wearing my equipment properly i had a physically easier time of it. but mentally i still couldn't quite get the hang of it. eventually i ended up swimming with my fingers on the lenses of my goggles, which helped. i think maybe so i wouldn't "forget" i was wearing a snorkel. i also tried to stay near people cause that made me feel more comfortable. even so, i would was still hyperventilating and screaming every time a wave came over me or when fish got too close (some big ones had pretty scary sharp teeth!). lol. even tho i didn't have a particularly good time, i would definitely do it again. the scariness is all mental, so it was worth it to see the fish in their "natural environment".
view of the casino from descanso beach |
after we got back we went to flemings for their happy hour and rip finally had their amazing burger. a great closer to a very relaxing two days.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
pre-natal decisions
warning: genetically modified humans
"...human pre-natal diagnosis... The object of the exercise: to identify foetuses with the earmarks of genetic disease as candidates for abortion."
rip and i talked about this the other month. we agreed that if we knew our kid was going to have a major mental or physical disability we would most likely choose to abort it. reasoning: "growing up is hard enough. i wouldn't want my kid to go through more discrimination / bullying / hardship if he had no arms or some sort of major mental handicap."
one of us then asked what we would do if we knew the kid was going to be gay? i said i'd keep it, rip said he would have to think about it. i was offended. but after thinking about it, i now see how hypocritical that is. being gay is hard. in america most of us don't worry about getting killed just because we're a certain ethnicity (it does happen, but not often enough to be really worried about). but being gay is dangerous. crazy haters will make my kid's life miserable just cause he likes boys instead of girls. so if my reasoning for not wanting a child with harlequin ichthyosis is that i want my kid's life be "easy" doesn't that mean i should also not want my kid to be gay? but how far does this go? (and yes, i know i'm approaching, or maybe even on, a slippery slope here...) should i also not want to have girl?
it's hard to be a parent. good parents want whatever's best for their child. but what's "best" isn't always clear.
"...human pre-natal diagnosis... The object of the exercise: to identify foetuses with the earmarks of genetic disease as candidates for abortion."
rip and i talked about this the other month. we agreed that if we knew our kid was going to have a major mental or physical disability we would most likely choose to abort it. reasoning: "growing up is hard enough. i wouldn't want my kid to go through more discrimination / bullying / hardship if he had no arms or some sort of major mental handicap."
one of us then asked what we would do if we knew the kid was going to be gay? i said i'd keep it, rip said he would have to think about it. i was offended. but after thinking about it, i now see how hypocritical that is. being gay is hard. in america most of us don't worry about getting killed just because we're a certain ethnicity (it does happen, but not often enough to be really worried about). but being gay is dangerous. crazy haters will make my kid's life miserable just cause he likes boys instead of girls. so if my reasoning for not wanting a child with harlequin ichthyosis is that i want my kid's life be "easy" doesn't that mean i should also not want my kid to be gay? but how far does this go? (and yes, i know i'm approaching, or maybe even on, a slippery slope here...) should i also not want to have girl?
it's hard to be a parent. good parents want whatever's best for their child. but what's "best" isn't always clear.
Sunday, October 7, 2012
Thursday, October 4, 2012
sf
backdrop to the races. pretty nice, no? |
gangnam style costumes |
twas pretty cold there! |
at black sands |
i couldn't roll up my skinny jeans, so i just took them off! |
at the chapel. those "books" are actually urns! |
not the only pyramid. and certainly not the fanciest mausoleum. |
otw back from point bonita lighthouse (which was closed) |
Monday, October 1, 2012
cali stats
joan didion - where i was from
"As recently as 1993, eighty-two thousand acres in California were still planted in alfalfa, a low-value crop requiring more water than was then use in the households of thirty million Californians. Almost a million and a half acres were planted in cotton, the state's second largest consumer of water, a crop subsidized directly by the federal government. Four hundred thousand acres were planted in rice, the cultivation of which involves submerging the fields under six inches of water from mid-April until August harvest, months during which, in California, no rain falls. The 1.6 million acre feet of water this required (an acre foot is roughly 326,000 gallons) was made available, even in drought years... Ninety percent of the California grain was glutinous medium-grain Japonica, a type not popular in the United States but favored in both Japan and Korea, each of which banned the import of California rice." (25-26)
"It was in 1993 when the California Department of Corrections activated its first "death fence," at Calipatria. It was in 1994 when the second "death fence" was activated at Lancaster, carrying a charge of 650 milliamperers, almost ten times the voltage required to cause instant death... It was also in 1994 when standardized testing of reading skills among California fourth-graders placed them last in the nation, below Mississippi, tied only with Louisiana. It was in 1995 when, for the first time, California spent more on its prisons than on its two university systems, the ten campuses of the University of California and the twenty-four campuses of California Sate University." (187)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)